Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2589MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6600 XT +1434%
10.6 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2021
Release Date
May 2015
Navi II
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1968 MHz
Base Clock
-
2589 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
331.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
21.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.60 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
662.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 23 XT (215-130000006)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy