Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT +958%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
1280
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy