Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT +188%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
4096
320
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy