Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT +614%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
1792
320
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy