Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 330W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XTX +24830%
24.93 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi II
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2435 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
5120
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

311.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
779.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
49.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1.558 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

330W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy