Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +986%
23.65 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
20
5120
Shading Units
1280
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

335W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy