Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +2265%
23.65 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
800
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

335W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy