Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +52455%
23.65 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Nov 2009
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

335W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy