Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 335W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT +3322%
23.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
May 2015
Navi II
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

335W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy