Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 335W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Navi II
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
2
128
ROPs
2
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

335W
TDP
15W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
VSA-101
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
180 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy