Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 7500 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 195% (2300MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7500 XT +1787%
9.421 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
Navi III
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1452 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2300 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

73.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
147.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
18.84 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.421 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
294.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 33
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy