Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 7700 XT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2544MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7700 XT +5536%
35.17 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2012
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1435 MHz
Base Clock
-
2544 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

54
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
3456
Shading Units
480
216
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
54
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
48 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

244.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
549.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
70.34 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
35.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
1099 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

245W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 32 XL (215-180000076)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy