Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +2013%
45.98 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1287 MHz
Base Clock
-
2245 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
1280
320
TMUs
80
160
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

359.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
718.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
91.96 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
1437 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 31 XL (215-145000206)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy