Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +117797%
45.98 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2023
Release Date
Oct 2009
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1287 MHz
Base Clock
-
2245 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
160
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

359.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
718.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
91.96 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1437 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 31 XL (215-145000206)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy