Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2090MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900M +15950%
38.52 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Navi Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2090 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
160
288
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

401.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
601.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
77.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
1204 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

180W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Seymour
Navi 31
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy