Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2090MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900M +2849%
38.52 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Navi Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2090 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
960
288
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
32
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

401.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
601.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
77.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
1204 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

180W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Navi 31
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy