Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2090MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900M +5242%
38.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Oct 2014
Navi Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
2090 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
384
288
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

401.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
601.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
77.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
38.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
1204 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Topaz
Navi 31
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy