Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5336 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +201493%
64.51 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Navi III
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
40
336
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
RV620
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy