Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4896 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +10238%
64.51 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2012
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
480
336
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy