Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +3172%
64.51 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2015
Navi III
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
896
336
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
16
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
85W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Tobago
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy