Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +16569%
64.51 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
5376
Shading Units
128
336
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
16
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G92B
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy