Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
5328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +64410%
64.51 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi III
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
5376
Shading Units
48
336
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy