Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XT +1045%
64.51 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2014
Navi III
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
512bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
2816
336
TMUs
176
192
ROPs
64
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
580W
700 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy