CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1471MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 56
+1866%
10.54 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 56
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1156 MHz
Base Clock
-
1471 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
216
224
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
94.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
329.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
21.09 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.54 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
659.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
210W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
3
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon R9 285
6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
7
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
10
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy