Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1546MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +151%
12.66 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
Vega
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
192bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
TU116
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy