Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (175W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +58%
12.66 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2016
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM
2048bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy