Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro W7000

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +420%
12.66 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy