Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +955%
12.66 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
Vega
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
800
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV770
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy