Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +864%
12.66 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2011
Vega
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1280MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
320bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
210W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GF110
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
3 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy