CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+663%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
VS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2019
Vega
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
2
AMD Radeon Vega 6 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
4
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
5
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
6
AMD Radeon HD 6790 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
7
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 DDR4
8
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
9
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
10
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy