Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +663%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2019
Vega
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy