Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1546MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +278%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Vega
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy