Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 260

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +724%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2013
Vega
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.536 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Bonaire
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy