Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1785MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 +47%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2019
Radeon Sky
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1792
Shading Units
1408
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
120W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Orthrus
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy