Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900 +380%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Sky
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
204W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Orthrus
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy