Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1410MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900
3.405 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +270%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Sky
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1792
Shading Units
4480
112
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Orthrus
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy