Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (2200MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +495%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Sky
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4608
112
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy