Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2008
Radeon R300
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV360
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Rage 9
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

24W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy