Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 24W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

24W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
R400
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy