Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FirePro D300

ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
R400
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy