Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI FirePro V3700

ATI Radeon X1050 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 32W)
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (15.20GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

24W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
R400
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy