Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
480
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Turks
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy