Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V4800

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
400
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Redwood
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy