Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.48GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 41W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2010
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
8
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GT218
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy