Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
AD107
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy