Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

27W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
R500
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy