Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 27W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

27W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
R500
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy