Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
Capsaicin
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy