Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
GK106
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy