Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
GK110B
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GK110-300-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy