Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA NVS 310

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
GF119
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy